SCCM is updating its SCCM Connect Community. Access to SCCM Connect may be limited until April 23.

Applying the ICU Liberation Bundle to Critically Ill Children

visual bubble
visual bubble
visual bubble
visual bubble

Karen Choong, MB, BCh, MSc, FRCPC
Samer Abu-Sultaneh, MD, FAAP

Advancements in pediatric critical care have led to improved patient survival. Unfortunately, this has been accompanied by an emerging population of pediatric survivors who suffer persistent physical, cognitive, emotional, psychological, or social disabilities, collectively known as post-intensive care syndrome-pediatrics.1 To combat these critical illness sequelae, the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) introduced the ICU Liberation Initiative to reduce harm and improve recovery in adults and children.2 The ICU Liberation Bundle (formerly referred to the ABCDEF Bundle) consists of interconnected elements that aim to reduce the harmful effects of excessive sedation, prolonged immobilization, sleep disruption, and delirium by enabling wakefulness, comfort, spontaneous breathing, and early mobilization. Its efficacy, as well as a dose-response effect to ICU liberation, has been reported to impact several clinically meaningful, patient-centered outcomes in adults.3,4 While the ICU liberation guidelines target both adult and pediatric populations, guidance on how to best apply this practice in children is lacking.

The aim of this article is to provide pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) practitioners with general guidance on implementation of the ICU Liberation Bundle. Learning from the adult collaborative efforts and single-center pediatric initiatives, the pediatric critical care community can use the following keys to success in their PICU liberation implementation journey (Table 1).

Application of ICU liberation is relatively new in pediatric care and represents a change in unit culture that takes time, resources, continual effort, auditing, and feedback for success. An essential first step is to apply an implementation framework that involves stakeholder engagement, an education and execution plan, and a process for evaluating the impact of implementing ICU liberation in the PICU.5 Establish a representative team of interprofessional champions that includes physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, rehabilitation specialists, and other healthcare and family representatives. Assign agreed-upon roles and responsibilities for each team member, and set reasonable timelines to achieve the team’s goals. Tailor the bundle to the needs of your unit by assessing current unit practices, knowledge gaps, potential barriers, and facilitators to successful implementation. Determine which bundle elements to prioritize and implement initially, then develop a stepwise plan and timeline for rollout of each element. Implementation of the PICU Liberation Bundle represents an investment of resources, so communicate regularly with the hospital and PICU leadership to ensure ongoing support and buy-in. Engage leadership on the benefits of PICU liberation and the strong evidence of its cost effectiveness.6,7

Use of validated pediatric assessment tools for each of the elements of the bundle is crucial; integrate
these tools in the electronic medical record, if possible. Using such objective measures facilitates communication between team members and allows for objective goal setting and assessment of daily targets. Introducing practice guidelines informed by the best available evidence supports knowledge for
practicing each bundle component, in particular sedation, delirium prevention, and early mobilization. 8,9

A: Assess, Prevent, and Manage Pain
Controlling pain is one of the most important elements of ICU liberation. The key to managing pain and discomfort is the application of routine, objective assessments. The revised Face, Legs, Activity,
Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, and numeric rating pain scale are pediatric tools that can be applied to a broad age range.10 To ensure a “less is more” approach, consider nonpharmacological adjuncts and nonopioid agents as first-line treatment, followed by judicious use of opioids for analgesia. As with any medication, beware of the adverse effects of opioids, such as respiratory depression, constipation, and risk of tolerance and dependence.

B: Both Spontaneous Awakening Trials and Spontaneous Breathing Trials
While spontaneous awakening trials are not commonly used in the PICU, care providers should strive to optimize the patient’s level of sedation, depending on the stage of illness, to allow the patient to be awake and spontaneously breathing when possible. While a number of validated tools are used to assess the level of arousal in the PICU, the State Behavioral Scale (SBS) and the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) are increasingly employed as they may be used in mechanically and nonmechanically ventilated children, and they are used as the initial step to pediatric delirium assessment.10-12

Daily screening to assess the patient’s eligibility to undergo a spontaneous breathing trial is essential to reduce invasive mechanical ventilation duration and its associated morbidities.13 Given their expertise and greater availability at bedside, the respiratory therapists (with help from nursing team and physicians) are the ideal personnel to identify who is eligible to undergo breathing trials and to perform those trials.14 In PICUs lacking respiratory therapists, the nursing team can perform this task.

C: Choice of Analgesia and Sedation
Sedation is typically given to facilitate invasive critical care interventions; however, most intubated children are excessively sedated, which is the key risk factor for the acquired morbidities of delirium, iatrogenic withdrawal, and immobility. ICU liberation promotes an analog-sedation approach, targeting lighter levels of sedation where possible and titration of sedatives based on objective goals.8,15 This approach has been shown to be feasible and safe in critically ill children.16-18 The increasing evidence of the relationship between benzodiazepines and delirium and sleep disruption has led to a preference for opioids and an increased interest in α2 agonists, such as dexmedetomidine.19 Using nonpharmacological adjuncts, implementing sleep best practices, and tying together other aspects of the bundle, such as family-centered care, can facilitate comfort and may alleviate excessive sedative use.

D: Delirium: Assess, Prevent, and Manage 
Delirium is as common and important in critically ill children as it is in adults.20,21 Therefore, routine delirium monitoring should be the standard of care in all PICUs, and strategies to prevent delirium should be prioritized. Two validated delirium screening tools are available for use with children: the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD), which can be used for pediatric patients of any age, and the Pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (pCAM-ICU), which can be used for patients older than 6 months.22-24 Delirium prevention can be achieved by promoting daynight cycles through daily routines (ie, physical activity during the day, sleep promotion at night) and minimizing exposure to medications that contribute to delirium, such as benzodiazepines and anticholinergic agents. Antipsychotic medications should be considered if nonpharmacological strategies alone are ineffective, symptoms are distressing to the patient, and delirium perpetuates sleep disruption.

E: Early Mobility and Exercise
Pediatric early mobility programs consist of the following elements: screening the patient for readiness
to mobilize each day, targeting the highest level of mobility that can be safely achieved based on the patient’s stage of illness, and ensuring that mobility occurs through a coordinated, collaborative team effort. 25,26 Mobility targets ideally should progress from in-bed, to edge-of-bed, and ultimately outof- bed functional mobility. Special attention should be paid to safety during mobilization to prevent accidental device disconnection or dislodgement, and to the patient’s tolerance and cardiorespiratory response.

F: Family Engagement and Empowerment
Many PICUs have adopted patient- and family-centered interprofessional daily rounds, empowering families to be part of the decision-making process for the patient’s daily care. Structured family care conferences can be used to establish long-term goals of care. Family engagement is key to the success of many elements of ICU liberation, such as providing comfort, promoting sleep, and facilitating mobilization and day-time activity, all of which serve to minimize pharmacological interventions. The SCCM’s Patient-Centered Outcomes Research-ICU Collaborative is an example of how to engage families in care of the critically ill child.27 

Integration of Good Sleep Hygiene
Another element of ICU liberation is under consideration: promoting integration of good sleep. Critically ill children are at risk for sleep disturbance, which may lead to escalation in sedative use, prolonged mechanical ventilation, delirium in the short term, and neurocognitive sequelae in the long term.28 Management of sleep disturbances starts with the routine evaluation of baseline sleep preferences or routines, and monitoring of sleep quality using subjective assessment scales while the patient is in the PICU.28 Good sleep can be achieved by ensuring wakefulness, promoting physical activity, and minimizing naps during the day; observing the child’s usual bedtimes and supporting sleep hygiene by decreasing noise, light, and screen time at night. Minimize sleep disruption by clustering nursing care; observe the patient’s usual routines and preferences where possible (ie, feeding times, optimal temperature, sleep position); treat pain; and when necessary, as a last resort, use sleep aid medications, such as melatonin. 

The Future of ICU Liberation for Pediatric Patients
The future of ICU liberation within the PICU relies on establishing a multicenter, quality improvement,
learning collaborative. This collaborative would be used as platform for exchanging information on successes, challenges, and resources among the various PICU teams. ICU liberation provides interested teams with tools and a data set toolkit to assess, implement, and evaluate the success of implementation of each element of the ICU Liberation Bundle.


  1. Manning JC, Pinto NP, Rennick JE, Colville G, Curley MAQ. Conceptualizing post intensive care syndrome in children-the PICS-p framework. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(4):298-300.
  2. Ely EW. The ABCDEF Bundle: science and philosophy of how ICU liberation serves patients and families. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(2):321-330.
  3. Barnes-Daly MA, Phillips G, Ely EW. Improving hospital survival and reducing brain dysfunction at seven California community hospitals: implementing PAD guidelines via the ABCDEF Bundle in 6,064 patients. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(2):171-178.
  4. Pun BT, Balas MC, Barnes-Daly MA, et al. Caring for critically ill patients with the ABCDEF Bundle: results of the ICU Liberation Collaborative in over 15,000 adults. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(1):3-14.
  5. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ 2008;337:a1714.
  6. Liu K, Ogura T, Takahashi K, et al. A progressive early mobilization program is significantly associated with clinical and economic improvement: a single-center quality comparison study. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(9):e744-e752.
  7. Ratcliffe J, Williams B. Impact of a mobility team on intensive care unit patient outcomes. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2019;31(2):141-151.
  8. Rosenberg L, Traube C. Sedation strategies in children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(19):509.
  9. Cuello-Garcia CA, Mai SHC, Simpson R, Al-Harbi S, Choong K. Early mobilization in critically ill children: a systematic review. J Pediatr. 2018;203:25-33 e26.
  10. Giordano V, Edobor J, Deindl P, et al. Pain and sedation scales for neonatal and pediatric patients in a preverbal stage of development: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Oct 14. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3351. [Epub ahead of print]
  11. Curley MA, Harris SK, Fraser KA, Johnson RA, Arnold JH. State Behavioral Scale: a sedation assessment instrument for infants and young children supported on mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7(2):107-114.
  12. Kerson AG, DeMaria R, Mauer E, et al. Validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in critically ill children. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:65.
  13. Foronda FK, Troster EJ, Farias JA, et al. The impact of daily evaluation and spontaneous breathing test on the duration of pediatric mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(11):2526-2533.
  14. Abu-Sultaneh S, Hole AJ, Tori AJ, Benneyworth BD, Lutfi R, Mastropietro CW. An interprofessional quality improvement initiative to standardize pediatric extubation readiness assessment. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(10):e463-e471.
  15. Curley MA, Wypij D, Watson RS, et al. Protocolized sedation vs usual care in pediatric patients mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(4):379-389.
  16. Penk JS, Lefaiver CA, Brady CM, Steffensen CM, Wittmayer K. Intermittent versus continuous and intermittent medications for pain and sedation after pediatric cardiothoracic surgery; a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(1):123-129.
  17. Gupta K, Gupta VK, Jayashree M, Singhi S. Randomized controlled trial of interrupted versus continuous sedative infusions in ventilated children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13(2):131-135.
  18. Valentine S, Nadkarni V, Curley MA, Group PALICC. Non-pulmonary treatments for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: proceedings from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16:S73-86.
  19. Mody K, Kaur S, Mauer EA, et al. Benzodiazepines and development of delirium in critically ill children: estimating the causal effect. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):1486-1491.
  20. Traube C, Silver G, Reeder RW, et al. Delirium in critically ill children: an international point prevalence study. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(4):584-590.
  21. Collet MO, Caballero J, Sonneville R, et al. Prevalence and risk factors related to haloperidol use for delirium in adult intensive care patients: the multinational AID-ICU inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(7):1081-1089.
  22. Traube C, Silver G, Kearney J, et al. Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: a valid, rapid, observational tool for screening delirium in the PICU. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(3):656-663.
  23. Smith HA, Boyd J, Fuchs DC, et al. Diagnosing delirium in critically ill children: validity and reliability of the Pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(1):150-157.
  24. Smith HA, Gangopadhyay M, Goben CM, et al. The Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU: valid and reliable delirium monitoring for critically ill infants and children. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(3):592-600.
  25. Wieczorek B, Ascenzi J, Kim Y, et al. PICU Up!: impact of a quality improvement intervention to promote early mobilization in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(12):e559-e566.
  26. Choong K, Canci F, Clark H, et al. Practice recommendations for early mobilization in critically ill children. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2018;7(1):14-26.
  27. Kleinpell R, Zimmerman J, Vermoch KL, et al. Promoting family engagement in the ICU: experience from a national collaborative of 63 ICUs. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(12):1692-1698.
  28. Kudchadkar SR, Aljohani OA, Punjabi NM. Sleep of critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit: a systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2014;18(2):103-110.